Eminent Domain Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 30

gamy Domain - Case Study ExampleThe city plan did not violate the constitutional taking clause. The retort clause protects the private property from conversion by the state for public use without exclusively compensation. The plan was engineered to boost the low economy by providing jobs to the unemployed and increase the tax receipts that would lastly see the citys economy stabilize. This step is beneficial to the public both directly and indirectly and a real public use of the justly acquired come to. The economic benefits, on the other hand, appear to be secondary and minor expense as brought forth by the dissenting judge. The developers seem to be the primary beneficiary of the acquisition and in that location is no surety that unemployment will be curbed and hence have the public benefit. All in all, the completed takings clause is objected towards just compensation of the private landowners where the government acquires such land for public use. From the foregoing, the land was put into public use that is faced as economic development having compensated the owners justly. It thus follows that the takings clause was not violated.